↓ Skip to main content

Evolving network representation learning based on random walks

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Network Science, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Evolving network representation learning based on random walks
Published in
Applied Network Science, March 2020
DOI 10.1007/s41109-020-00257-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farzaneh Heidari, Manos Papagelis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2020.
All research outputs
#20,612,116
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Applied Network Science
#499
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,501
of 367,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Network Science
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.