↓ Skip to main content

The bizzare phenomenon of smokers’ paradox in the immediate outcome post acute myocardial infarction: an insight into the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS…

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
The bizzare phenomenon of smokers’ paradox in the immediate outcome post acute myocardial infarction: an insight into the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry year 2006–2013
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2188-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Padmaa Venkatason, Norsabihin Mohd Salleh, Yong Zubairi, Imran Hafidz, Wan Azman Wan Ahmad, Sim Kui Han, Ahmad Syadi Mahmood Zuhdi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 30%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#16,037,422
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#810
of 1,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,385
of 312,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#69
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.