↓ Skip to main content

Health Shocks and the Hazard Rate of Early Retirement in the ECHP

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Health Shocks and the Hazard Rate of Early Retirement in the ECHP
Published in
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf03399257
Authors

Ronald Hagan, Andrew M. Jones, Nigel Rice

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,795,929
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
#36
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,823
of 159,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.