Title |
Referring physicians underestimate the extent of abnormalities in final reports from myocardial perfusion imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
EJNMMI Research, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2191-219x-2-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elin Trägårdh, Peter Höglund, Mattias Ohlsson, Mattias Wieloch, Lars Edenbrandt |
Abstract |
It is important that referring physicians and other treating clinicians properly understand the final reports from diagnostic tests. The aim of the study was to investigate whether referring physicians interpret a final report for a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) test in the same way that the reading nuclear medicine physician intended. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Professor | 2 | 29% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 71% |
Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#335
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,576
of 166,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.