| Title |
The role of CD133 in cancer: a concise review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40169-018-0198-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paige M. Glumac, Aaron M. LeBeau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 384 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 15% |
| Researcher | 53 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 125 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 110 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 136 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,070,366
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#82
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,575
of 339,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.