↓ Skip to main content

Fire Enhances Whitebark Pine Seedling Establishment, Survival, and Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Fire Enhances Whitebark Pine Seedling Establishment, Survival, and Growth
Published in
Fire Ecology, August 2015
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1102084
Authors

Judy L. Perkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 39%
Environmental Science 15 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,609,253
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#111
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,857
of 264,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them