| Title |
Understanding visual lip-based biometric authentication for mobile devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Information Security, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13635-020-0102-6 |
| Authors |
Carrie Wright, Darryl William Stewart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 30% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,331,423
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Information Security
#7
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,461
of 389,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Information Security
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them