↓ Skip to main content

Tracing outliers in the dataset of Drosophila suzukii records with the Isolation Forest method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Tracing outliers in the dataset of Drosophila suzukii records with the Isolation Forest method
Published in
Journal of Big Data, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40537-020-00288-8
Authors

Ugo Santosuosso, Alessandro Cini, Alessio Papini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,716,137
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#265
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,790
of 361,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.