| Title |
Screening transferable microsatellite markers across genus Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Botanical Studies, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40529-017-0200-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ya-Zhu Ko, Huei-Chuan Shih, Chi-Chu Tsai, Hsing-Hua Ho, Pei-Chun Liao, Yu-Chung Chiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#51
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,070
of 335,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.