Title |
Digital image correlation as a tool for three‐dimensional strain analysis in human tendon tissue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40634-014-0007-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Luyckx, Matthias Verstraete, Karel De Roo, Wim De Waele, Johan Bellemans, Jan Victor |
Abstract |
Determining the mechanical behaviour of tendon and ligamentous tissue remains challenging, as it is anisotropic, non-linear and inhomogeneous in nature. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) digital image correlation (DIC) was adopted to examine the strain distribution in the human Achilles tendon. Therefore, 6 fresh frozen human Achilles tendon specimens were mounted in a custom made rig for uni-axial loading. 3D DIC measurements of each loading position were obtained and compared to 2 linear variable differential transformers (LVDT's). 3D DIC was able to calculate tendon strain in every region of all obtained images. The scatter was found to be low in all specimens and comparable to that obtained in steel applications. The accuracy of the 3D DIC measurement was higher in the centre of the specimen where scatter values around 0.03% strain were obtained. The overall scatter remained below 0.3% in all specimens. The spatial resolution of 3D DIC on human tendon tissue was found to be 0.1 mm(2). The correlation coefficient between the 3D DIC measurements and the LVDT measurements showed an excellent linear agreement in all specimens (R(2) = 0.99). Apart from the longitudinal strain component, an important transverse strain component was revealed in all specimens. The strain distribution of both components was of a strongly inhomogeneous nature, both within the same specimen and amongst different specimens. DIC proved to be a very accurate and reproducible tool for 3D strain analysis in human tendon tissue. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 52 | 41% |
Materials Science | 7 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 43 | 34% |