↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical and petrographic identification of stone quarries used for the construction of the Anahita Temple of Kangavar (West Iran)

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Geochemical and petrographic identification of stone quarries used for the construction of the Anahita Temple of Kangavar (West Iran)
Published in
Heritage Science, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40494-020-0361-z
Authors

Atefeh Shekofteh, Omid Oudbashi, Giuseppe Cultrone, Masoud Ansari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Energy 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,608,970
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#386
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,314
of 459,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.