↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of current disruption and magnetic reconnection

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 192)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of current disruption and magnetic reconnection
Published in
Geoscience Letters, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40562-015-0031-2
Authors

A. T. Y. Lui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,607,773
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#50
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,286
of 389,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them