| Title |
The efficacy of uterine artery embolization with gelatin sponge for retained products of conception with bleeding and future pregnancy outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-020-00107-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasushi Kimura, Keigo Osuga, Keisuke Nagai, Hidenari Hongyo, Kaishu Tanaka, Yusuke Ono, Hiroki Higashihara, Shinya Matsuzaki, Masayuki Endo, Tadashi Kimura, Noriyuki Tomiyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,683,678
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#60
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,125
of 456,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.