↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of anti-ROS and anticancer properties of Tabebuia pallida L. Leaves

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of anti-ROS and anticancer properties of Tabebuia pallida L. Leaves
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40816-019-0111-5
Authors

Md. Mahbubur Rahman, A. S. M. Sakhawat Hossain, Md. Golam Mostofa, Muhammad Ali Khan, Rezwan Ali, Ashik Mosaddik, Md. Golam Sadik, A. H. M. Khurshid Alam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,601,089
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#31
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,551
of 351,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them