| Title |
Development and validation of the Crohn’s disease patient-reported outcomes signs and symptoms (CD-PRO/SS) diary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0044-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter D. R. Higgins, Gale Harding, Nancy K. Leidy, Kendra DeBusk, Donald L. Patrick, Hema N. Viswanathan, Kristina Fitzgerald, Sarah M. Donelson, Marcoli Cyrille, Brian G. Ortmeier, Hilary Wilson, Dennis A. Revicki, Gary Globe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 30% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Romania | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Egypt | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,828,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#99
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,409
of 328,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.