↓ Skip to main content

Natural versus artificial light exposure on delirium incidence in ARDS patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Natural versus artificial light exposure on delirium incidence in ARDS patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-0630-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Farshid R. Bashar, Abbas M. Khan, Andrew C. Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,932,281
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#837
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,824
of 469,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.