Title |
Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of STEM Education, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40594-020-0203-2 |
Authors |
Emily Borda, Emily Schumacher, Daniel Hanley, Edward Geary, Shannon Warren, Cassidy Ipsen, Lauren Stredicke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
Researcher | 16 | 7% |
Lecturer | 14 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
Other | 52 | 24% |
Unknown | 76 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 37 | 17% |
Engineering | 13 | 6% |
Mathematics | 10 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 4% |
Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
Other | 54 | 25% |
Unknown | 87 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,184,015
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#49
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,422
of 449,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.