| Title |
Prone positioning monitored by electrical impedance tomography in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome on veno-venous ECMO
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-0633-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Franchineau, Nicolas Bréchot, Guillaume Hekimian, Guillaume Lebreton, Simon Bourcier, Pierre Demondion, Loïc Le Guennec, Ania Nieszkowska, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Italy | 2 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,811,579
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#450
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,553
of 453,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.