↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Himalayas

Overview of attention for article published in Geoenvironmental Disasters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Knowledge based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Himalayas
Published in
Geoenvironmental Disasters, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40677-016-0042-0
Authors

Dinesh Pathak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 25%
Engineering 7 25%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,823,163
of 7,700,406 outputs
Outputs from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#18
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,619
of 269,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,700,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.