↓ Skip to main content

Antibody signatures in patients with histopathologically defined multiple sclerosis patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Antibody signatures in patients with histopathologically defined multiple sclerosis patterns
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00401-019-02120-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidia Stork, David Ellenberger, Klemens Ruprecht, Markus Reindl, Tim Beißbarth, Tim Friede, Tania Kümpfel, Lisa A. Gerdes, Mareike Gloth, Thomas Liman, Friedemann Paul, Wolfgang Brück, Imke Metz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,815,098
of 14,372,250 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#491
of 1,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,547
of 200,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#32
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,372,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.