↓ Skip to main content

Fulminant corticobasal degeneration: a distinct variant with predominant neuronal tau aggregates

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 tweeters
Title
Fulminant corticobasal degeneration: a distinct variant with predominant neuronal tau aggregates
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00401-019-02119-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Ling, Ellen Gelpi, Karen Davey, Zane Jaunmuktane, Kin Y. Mok, Edwin Jabbari, Roberto Simone, Lea R’Bibo, Sebastian Brandner, Matthew J. Ellis, Johannes Attems, David Mann, Glenda M. Halliday, S. Al-Sarraj, J. Hedreen, James W. Ironside, Gabor G. Kovacs, E. Kovari, S. Love, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel, Kieren S. J. Allinson, Daniela Hansen, Teisha Bradshaw, Núria Setó-Salvia, Selina Wray, Rohan de Silva, Huw R. Morris, Thomas T. Warner, John Hardy, Janice L. Holton, Tamas Revesz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#789,772
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#130
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,486
of 182,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.