↓ Skip to main content

Ulcer metastasis? Anatomical locations of recurrence for patients in diabetic foot remission

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 558)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 tweeters
Title
Ulcer metastasis? Anatomical locations of recurrence for patients in diabetic foot remission
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13047-020-0369-3
Authors

Brian J. Petersen, Gary M. Rothenberg, Priti J. Lakhani, Min Zhou, David R. Linders, Jonathan D. Bloom, Katherine A. Wood, David G. Armstrong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#741,094
of 14,263,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#47
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,194
of 264,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,263,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.