↓ Skip to main content

Falco lanarius: the contorted history of a poetical archetype and a taxonomic puzzle

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Falco lanarius: the contorted history of a poetical archetype and a taxonomic puzzle
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s12520-019-00995-1
Authors

Giovanni Leonardi, Luke J. Sutton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,660,831
of 14,249,443 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#144
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,230
of 262,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#17
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,249,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.