↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of high-resolution downscaling experiments for assessing strong wind hazard at local scales in complex terrain: a case study of Typhoon Songda (2004)

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Benefits of high-resolution downscaling experiments for assessing strong wind hazard at local scales in complex terrain: a case study of Typhoon Songda (2004)
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-019-0317-7
Authors

Tetsuya Takemi, Rui Ito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,668,353
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#234
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,422
of 456,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.