↓ Skip to main content

Review of “The Model Thinker” by Scott Page

Overview of attention for article published in Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Review of “The Model Thinker” by Scott Page
Published in
Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40294-019-0068-8
Authors

Muaz A. Niazi, László Barna Iantovics, Anatoly Temkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#19,020,456
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling
#70
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,532
of 459,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.