↓ Skip to main content

Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge
Published in
Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-8047-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichi Iwasaki, Megumi Fujisawa, Tagiru Ogino, Hiroyuki Mano, Naohide Shinohara, Shigeki Masunaga, Masashi Kamo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,668,118
of 14,515,681 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring & Assessment
#677
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,791
of 315,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring & Assessment
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,515,681 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.