↓ Skip to main content

Haematologists’ experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: a qualitative study for applied practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Haematologists’ experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: a qualitative study for applied practice
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0166-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stine Thestrup Hansen, Mette Kjerholt, Sarah Friis Christensen, Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, John Brodersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,661,147
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#161
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,773
of 458,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.