| Title |
Investigation on the Effectiveness of Aqueous Carbonated Lime in Producing an Alternative Cementitious Material
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40069-016-0129-8 |
| Authors |
Byung-Wan Jo, Sumit Chakraborty, Ji Sun Choi, Jun Ho Jo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 53% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,603,851
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
#8
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,983
of 298,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them