| Title |
Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response with LI-RADS: a pictorial review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0801-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Voizard, Milena Cerny, Anis Assad, Jean-Sébastien Billiard, Damien Olivié, Pierre Perreault, Ania Kielar, Richard K. G. Do, Takeshi Yokoo, Claude B. Sirlin, An Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| Italy | 3 | 8% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Austria | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 26% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 43% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,467,928
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#62
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,190
of 470,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.