@AHuisein @Rosa_spreekt @mkeulemans @hansvantelling @Henk47806375 https://t.co/rbtuldVivI over influenza: R0 onder de twee. De R0 van de wuhan lag al op 3 en de varianten daarna werden alleen maar hoger. Dus ja Covid is besmettelijker dan influenza.
@Lafferthon @rv_enigma @icestormfr Man kennt die Werte ziemlich gut, da es neben den laufenden Fallmeldung zahlreiche Bevölkerungsstudien in vielen Ländern gibt, bei denen die Asymptomatischen nicht rausfallen. Für die saisonale Grippe geht man eher von 1
@ValentinThoss @MikeDeeeeeee @EckerleIsabella Estimated basis reproduction number R0 for seasonal influenza: Mean value: 1,3 Minimum (out-of-season): 0,9 Maximum (peak-of-season): 2,1 https://t.co/zwRIjztxLr
@AgnesWold @OscarTengmark @f_hieronymus @ruter_knekt Jag kan ju iallafall konstatera att man iallafall tidigare har estimerar R0-värden för exempelvis svininfluensan (där stora delar av den lite befolkningen väl visade sig ha en hygglig immunitet pga tidig
The special strain of influenza dubbed swine flu caused a major pandemic during its first appearance due to its incredibly high transmission rate What do you think would be the most important factor in controlling this outbreak? https://t.co/pxL2pvxGLB @HP
@11Rainybows @Bananahamarama @thecoraesthetic @ComfortablySmug "R0 estimated for the 1918–1919 pandemic strain (mean R0~2: range 1.4 to 2.8)" ~ https://t.co/5oOv1hdfLM So where does BananaMan get 8.0 from!?
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
@Kontrolleur2 @El_Facht @DPiffl 3) Influenza: - https://t.co/aH3Hsq7HPx - https://t.co/5kimVdbo9S - https://t.co/3JhRFpLFn2 - https://t.co/VZlarKOykA SARS-CoV-2: - https://t.co/Iac3GRlEkZ - https://t.co/s4EGXbsKvB - https://t.co/ek1UNNP5lB - https://t.co/
😳
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @Maltizm @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @Maltizm @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @Maltizm @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
This is true, but the fatality rate is not as high as those examples.
RT @TroyLaclaire: @Maltizm @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
And Delta is R0 8to9😳
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) wa…
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
@Maltizm @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimated 25 and 39 million people. https://t.co/qr3AKJtVAv More contagious than pneumonic plague which has a R0 of 2.8 to 3.5 that once kill
RT @TroyLaclaire: @PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimate…
@PhysWiz @SeamusBlackley More contagious than the Spanish Flu, which had a R0 range of 1.4 to 2.8, and killed an estimated 25 and 39 million people. https://t.co/qr3AKJtVAv More contagious than pneumonic plague which has a R0 of 2.8 to 3.5 that once kill
@SeamusBlackley Significant when you consider that the R0 of the H1N1 was around 1.4 to 1.6 and the Spanish Flu (1918) was 1.4 to 2.8. https://t.co/qr3AKJtVAv
@JesseVentura86 @TaunRey @Karl_Lauterbach R0 bei saisonaler Influenza liegt bei 1.2-1.6., bei COVID-19 (DELTA) R0 ca. 6. Kann man sich ausrechnen was passiert, wenn man das frei laufen lässt. https://t.co/Isg946c8nZ https://t.co/diCXRoFRu4
@PeJay06069697 @FreedomIsrael_ R number for flu is 0,9-2,0 R number for sars-cov-2 is 6-8 with delta variants https://t.co/RVdQoyRYZZ
@IChooseFacts @McGhost908 @andrewbostom Or maybe, just spit balling here, covid is more contagious than flu. R° H1N1 ≈ 1.4-1.6 R° Covid ≈ 2-4 https://t.co/nby3l8Ysvo https://t.co/366wRowcky
@stv_fx @covid_ch @GillesMaumary @BAG_OFSP_UFSP Non. SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/IMZLep3ti1 Influenza: https://t.co/Gvg692YfHZ
@PeterHafner20 @jp30567 @vwt1812 @Karl_Lauterbach Gut weiteres Beispiel: "R0 values estimated for seasonal strains of influenza (mean R0 1.3: range 0.9 to 2.1)" https://t.co/3ndqNqPtIO Aber ist sicher auch Fake, wie jede wissenschaftliche Publikation.
@Lucasvdster @AnthonyMigchels Ik dacht dat je RIVM niet vertrouwde maar ok, hier een echt artikel dan: https://t.co/QUd1s6nPdW
@AuroriaTwittori @nonexistentuse4 @KubeCatherine The R0 for Covid-19 is 3.8-8.9, whereas R0 for seasonal influenza is 0.9–2.1. https://t.co/mHsu1vhThv https://t.co/qpA0iT8ILo
@DerfelTheMighty @carstenpeitz @Flingeraner @stohr_klaus @Joldjirl @Karl_Lauterbach Es gibt verschiedene Influenza-Typen die unterschiedliche Rs haben (die Umgebung und Kultur) hat sicher auch einen Einfluss: Hier: https://t.co/vuwelRGbeL oder hier: https:
@sheptinstall @Karlos_Anthony @ClarkeMicah https://t.co/x0rLqHALXs is one paper that derives the 4.5 figure for covid; I've seen higher estimates also https://t.co/QzMVjFM9PQ for Influenza r0 estimates
@KrollMik123 Apparently the r0 value for influenza is about 1.4. Which may be less than COVID. What i am arguing, tho, is it probably takes on average a smaller viral load than influenza to become a serious problem for an individual. https://t.co/9MlgFd0
@julietast2 @collabchem R0 differences. https://t.co/BrbSMpfK9c
@IchKuh @Toolianmax @Karl_Lauterbach https://t.co/VErhOQ6NeY R-Wert SARS-CoV-2: ca. 3 https://t.co/bNlpR3ecdp Influenza: ca. 2
@DomOfClarkes @carlheneghan @deeksj I never said "lower R0" - I said similar. And for sure their Rt is turning out similar. C19 IFR is much *higher* than influenza for the medically frail over 65. It is MUCH lower for those under 17. Blended IFR is sim
@pirijanne @TomimPAAN @MakeSokerivuori @AnneTorppa @MadetojaStig @HeikkiRay @mapetti @L0rava @MikaelNiku @Mikko_He @Tilastokeskus On, arviot jotain 1,3-1,5:n kieppeillä. Espanjan taudissa arvioitiin korkeammaksi. Tässä jotain näistä https://t.co/IrapwS6HF
@Nadav_Eyal אנחנו מסכימים שקורונה מסוכנת מאד לאוכלוסיות מסויימות ולאחרות פחות משפעת. ובמקום להשוות בצורה פשטנית מדד הדבקה, אפשר וצריך להתעמק במורכבות של הדברים ופתרונות ארוכי טווח שהם עם נזק מינימלי. https://t.co/lSmognaJVj
@alexharv074 @MLevitt_NP2013 Yes I am sure. https://t.co/G1a2amjqzd https://t.co/J9WTGfkfV2 https://t.co/scDaDPvLFE COVID-19 is also particularly prone to asymptomatic transmission, which makes it harder to *reduce* R0 by simple measures. https://t.co/
@ASengeleitner @SHomburg Weil SARS-CoV2 ansteckender ist als Influenzaviren. Basisreproduktionszahl R0 ist offenbar über 3, während saisonale Influenza um 1,3 liegt (siehe z.B. https://t.co/SJXMVVX0ou). Milde Maßnahmen senken R von Influenza also unter 1,
@JimMFelton Oh and of course the relevant factor at play that literally compounds the mortality impact is the rate of infection or R0 which, uncontrolled, is about 2.5 for coronavirus & 1.3 average for seasonal flu. https://t.co/BnJED7b5cK https://t.
@bioZhena Coburn, B. J. et al. (2009) “Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1)”, BMC Med 7, 30. https://t.co/nVrhpi4DTA
@Matthew09351501 @CDCgov Coburn, B. J. et al. (2009) “Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1)”, BMC Med 7, 30. https://t.co/nVrhpi4DTA
@carly_x @Mudney @abitofshoepie @BorisJohnson The average R rate for seasonal flu is 1.3 (that's with no preventative measures) Journal reference: https://t.co/4ZcIhBUheE Covid is generally accepted to be an R value of around 6 when no preventative measu
@LBonneux @mdc_martinus R0 van SARS-CoV2 zonder maatregelen wel beduidend hoger (4.5 in BE, https://t.co/SHi4eWN4qk, gem. 3.3, https://t.co/4GC7Yi9eqz, in Wuhan 5.7, https://t.co/tXc8vI8rAw) dan van seizoensgriep (gem R0 1.3, https://t.co/brkmXql1Hg). Maar
RT @ibrhmTanyalcin: @DrMetinCakir @drbulentpolat Mevsimsel grip icin su verilere: https://t.co/f6i9xRZxdO birde h1n1 icin bile su makaley…
@DrMetinCakir @drbulentpolat Mevsimsel grip icin su verilere: https://t.co/f6i9xRZxdO birde h1n1 icin bile su makaleye bakar isek: https://t.co/5IPXcqOzWo kabaca bir r degeri karsimiza cikiyor. covid icin su makaleye bakarsak: https://t.co/GsImsvP7tq
Yikes. For context, the RO range for the 1918 pandemic is estimated at 1.4 to 2.8. 😷 https://t.co/LKm7kPJSiF
Influenza vs Covid19 ile ilgili tweet dizisi: https://t.co/4Af70qzmnN Preliminer genom karşılaştırma: https://t.co/0rtnWBSFE1 R0 değerleri ile ilgili: https://t.co/5IPXcqOzWo https://t.co/GsImsvP7tq https://t.co/Wh0PVB8j0S +++
@EndUKLockdown1 In my opinion, R was used to divert attention away from real data and over to the scary assumptions drawn from models, that said... This study estimated that R0 values for seasonal strains of influenza have a mean of R0 1.3 (from a range of
@hganzo @velardedaoiz2 @drizzt__dourden El valor de R0 de la gripe (una enfermedad que lleva un siglo siendo estudiada) que he puesto viene de este estudio (de 2009), sólo para que percibas la complejidad de estos asuntos, como para despacharlos con un put
@LRsecreta @JoanMiquelMJ @Carlitos_martnz @doctorgaona @chicadelaradio @olgarallo 2/3- En la pandemia de gripe de 2018, que causó 50 millones de muertes en el mundo, el número básico de reproducción era de entre 1.4 y 2.8 (https://t.co/Rn4T9h8vQv)
En la pandemia de gripe de 2018, que causó 50 millones de muertes en el mundo, el número básico de reproducción fue de entre 1.4 y 2.8: https://t.co/Rn4T9gQUYX
RT @HashemGhaili: Seasonal Flu Vs COVID-19 Learn more: - https://t.co/vEmaGu9Rzl - https://t.co/NKT3g2vc0V - https://t.co/dqGlEZ0Uu2 - ht…
RT @gcochran99: @jonatanpallesen @magnusnordborg @negatingspirit The R0 for H1N1, the 2009 flu, was estimated to be between 1.4 and 1.6 .h…
RT @gcochran99: @jonatanpallesen @magnusnordborg @negatingspirit The R0 for H1N1, the 2009 flu, was estimated to be between 1.4 and 1.6 .h…
@jonatanpallesen @magnusnordborg @negatingspirit The R0 for H1N1, the 2009 flu, was estimated to be between 1.4 and 1.6 .https://t.co/peLo4HYSLe Final serological prevalence ( world): 24%. https://t.co/D5AT5MoDQO
*R0: Coburn, B. J., Wagner, B. G., & Blower, S. (2009). Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1). BMC medicine, 7, 30. https://t.co/la5nXvqlEK
@michelaccad It was H1N1 right ? The estimated reproductive numbers both in the 1918 and the more recent 2009 outbreak were way below 3 and the Rona is a respectable 4+ https://t.co/64xt88DMxt
@twittsux22 @Mark6569 @JayLouis @AllegromyUSA @ndrew_lawrence Also, the basic reproduction number of Covid-19 is 2-2.5 (or higher), while for seasonal flu, it is 1.4-1.6, which means Covid-19 is much more infectious. https://t.co/xqtcjFnwu3 https://t.co
@LibertyOfConsc @Channakt @CaputoStephanie @Alyssa_Milano Seasonal flu has an R0 of between 0.9 and 2.1 https://t.co/ihbshu35qu . C-19 has an R0 up to 5.7 https://t.co/EcBRaDQzUp .
@Cornwell7Steve Research journal link for influenza R0 (1.3): https://t.co/AHhMKbplym