Title |
Open source data reveals connection between online and on-street protest activity
|
---|---|
Published in |
EPJ Data Science, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0081-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hong Qi, Pedro Manrique, Daniela Johnson, Elvira Restrepo, Neil F Johnson |
Abstract |
There is enormous interest in inferring features of human behavior in the real world from potential digital footprints created online - particularly at the collective level, where the sheer volume of online activity may indicate some changing mood within the population regarding a particular topic. Civil unrest is a prime example, involving the spontaneous appearance of large crowds of otherwise unrelated people on the street on a certain day. While indicators of brewing protests might be gleaned from individual online communications or account content (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) societal concerns regarding privacy can make such probing a politically delicate issue. Here we show that instead, a simple low-level indicator of civil unrest can be obtained from online data at the aggregate level through Google Trends or similar tools. Our study covers countries across Latin America during 2011-2014 in which diverse civil unrest events took place. In each case, we find that the combination of the volume and momentum of searches from Google Trends surrounding pairs of simple keywords, tailored for the specific cultural setting, provide good indicators of periods of civil unrest. This proof-of-concept study motivates the search for more geographically specific indicators based on geo-located searches at the urban level. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Turkey | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 66% |
Scientists | 17 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 18 | 32% |
Computer Science | 9 | 16% |
Mathematics | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |