↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Impact of intensive care unit supportive care on the physiology of Ebola virus disease in a universally lethal non-human primate model

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Impact of intensive care unit supportive care on the physiology of Ebola virus disease in a universally lethal non-human primate model
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40635-019-0283-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Poliquin, Duane Funk, Shane Jones, Kaylie Tran, Charlene Ranadheera, Mable Hagan, Kevin Tierney, Allen Grolla, Amrinder Dhaliwal, Alexander Bello, Anders Leung, Cory Nakamura, Darwyn Kobasa, Darryl Falzarano, Lauren Garnett, Hugues Fausther Bovendo, Heinz Feldmann, Murray Kesselman, Gregory Hansen, Jason Gren, George Risi, Mia Biondi, Todd Mortimer, Trina Racine, Yvon Deschambault, Sam Aminian, Jocelyn Edmonds, Ray Saurette, Mark Allan, Lauren Rondeau, Sharron Hadder, Christy Press, Christine DeGraff, Stephanie Kucas, Bradley W. M. Cook, B. J. Hancock, Anand Kumar, Reeni Soni, Daryl Schantz, Jarrid McKitrick, Bryce Warner, Bryan D. Griffin, Xiangguo Qiu, Gary P. Kobinger, Dave Safronetz, Derek Stein, Todd Cutts, James Kenny, Geoff Soule, Robert Kozak, Steven Theriault, Liam Menec, Robert Vendramelli, Sean Higgins, Logan Banadyga, Guodong Liu, Md Niaz Rahim, Samantha Kasloff, Angela Sloan, Shihua He, Nikesh Tailor, Alixandra Albietz, Brad Pickering, Gary Wong, Michael Gray, James E. Strong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,595,624
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#372
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,414
of 459,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.