↓ Skip to main content

Prioritization of genes driving congenital phenotypes of patients with de novo genomic structural variants

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Prioritization of genes driving congenital phenotypes of patients with de novo genomic structural variants
Published in
Genome Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13073-019-0692-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjors Middelkamp, Judith M. Vlaar, Jacques Giltay, Jerome Korzelius, Nicolle Besselink, Sander Boymans, Roel Janssen, Lisanne de la Fonteijne, Ellen van Binsbergen, Markus J. van Roosmalen, Ron Hochstenbach, Daniela Giachino, Michael E. Talkowski, Wigard P. Kloosterman, Edwin Cuppen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,475,151
of 14,104,168 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#555
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,179
of 272,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#58
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,104,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.