| Title |
Modulating the distribution and fate of exogenously delivered MSCs to enhance therapeutic potential: knowns and unknowns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-019-0235-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire H. Masterson, Gerard F. Curley, John G. Laffey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,594,080
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#372
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,035
of 346,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.