↓ Skip to main content

The increasing menace of dengue in Guangzhou, 2001–2016: the most important epicenter in mainland China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
The increasing menace of dengue in Guangzhou, 2001–2016: the most important epicenter in mainland China
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4504-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhoubin Zhang, Qinlong Jing, Zongqiu Chen, Tiegang Li, Liyun Jiang, Yilan Li, Lei Luo, John Marshall, Zhicong Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,426,651
of 14,076,258 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,887
of 5,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,390
of 263,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#193
of 625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,076,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.