↓ Skip to main content

Gender-Specific Beneficial Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Dietary Supplementation in G93A-SOD1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Gender-Specific Beneficial Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Dietary Supplementation in G93A-SOD1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13311-019-00808-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascual Torres, Daniel Cacabelos, Jèssica Pairada, Kylynda C Bauer, Jordi Boada, Laia Fontdevila, Chiara Rossi, Monica Povedano, Isidre Ferrer, Reinald Pamplona, B. Brett Finlay, Manuel Portero-Otín, Victòria Ayala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,395,143
of 14,098,451 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#94
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,297
of 277,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,098,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them