↓ Skip to main content

Gender-Specific Beneficial Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Dietary Supplementation in G93A-SOD1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Gender-Specific Beneficial Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Dietary Supplementation in G93A-SOD1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s13311-019-00808-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascual Torres, Daniel Cacabelos, Jèssica Pairada, Kylynda C Bauer, Jordi Boada, Laia Fontdevila, Chiara Rossi, Monica Povedano, Isidre Ferrer, Reinald Pamplona, B Brett Finlay, Manuel Portero-Otín, Victòria Ayala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Lecturer 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 35 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 37 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,708,555
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#257
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,561
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.