| Title |
Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01292-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna-Lena Rau, Verena Burkhardt, Christian Dorninger, Cecilia Hjort, Karin Ibe, Lisa Keßler, Jeppe A. Kristensen, Andrew McRobert, William Sidemo-Holm, Heike Zimmermann, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden, Johan Ekroos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 26 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,944,710
of 24,140,950 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#891
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,410
of 466,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,140,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.