↓ Skip to main content

Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations
Published in
Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01292-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Lena Rau, Verena Burkhardt, Christian Dorninger, Cecilia Hjort, Karin Ibe, Lisa Keßler, Jeppe A. Kristensen, Andrew McRobert, William Sidemo-Holm, Heike Zimmermann, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden, Johan Ekroos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,636,371
of 14,093,691 outputs
Outputs from Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment
#462
of 998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,596
of 275,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.