↓ Skip to main content

In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: clinical presentation and outcomes in a real-world scenario

Overview of attention for article published in The Egyptian Heart Journal, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: clinical presentation and outcomes in a real-world scenario
Published in
The Egyptian Heart Journal, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s43044-019-0025-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganesh Paramasivam, Tom Devasia, Shabeer Ubaid, Ashwitha Shetty, Krishnananda Nayak, Umesh Pai, Mugula Sudhakar Rao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,352,108
of 15,124,215 outputs
Outputs from The Egyptian Heart Journal
#36
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,029
of 345,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Egyptian Heart Journal
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.