↓ Skip to main content

Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 638)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters
Title
Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aliki Thomas, Stuart Lubarsky, Lara Varpio, Steven J. Durning, Meredith E. Young

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#675,067
of 14,088,628 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#13
of 638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,632
of 274,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,088,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them