↓ Skip to main content

Review of: Riccardo Mario Cucciolla (ed.): Dimensions and challenges of Russian liberalism. Historical drama and new prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in East European Thought, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Review of: Riccardo Mario Cucciolla (ed.): Dimensions and challenges of Russian liberalism. Historical drama and new prospects
Published in
Studies in East European Thought, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11212-019-09354-1
Authors

Evert van der Zweerde

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,690,118
of 14,067,552 outputs
Outputs from Studies in East European Thought
#42
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,835
of 261,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in East European Thought
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,067,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.