↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of bacterial pathogens on edible macroalgae in coastal waters

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Assessment of bacterial pathogens on edible macroalgae in coastal waters
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10811-019-01993-5
Authors

Olivia N. Barberi, Carrie J. Byron, Kristin M. Burkholder, Adam T. St. Gelais, Alicia K. Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#10,698,407
of 14,079,291 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#623
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,666
of 267,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#24
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,079,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.