↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Social Determinants of Health and Associations of Social Needs Among United States Adults, 2011–2014

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of Social Determinants of Health and Associations of Social Needs Among United States Adults, 2011–2014
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05362-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun Ji Kim, Sara Abrahams, Omolara Uwemedimo, Joseph Conigliaro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,905,007
of 15,184,829 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,694
of 5,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,251
of 348,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#145
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.