| Title |
Conservative oxygen therapy for mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis: a post hoc analysis of data from the intensive care unit randomized trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05857-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Young, Diane Mackle, Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, Richard Beasley, Adam Deane, Glenn Eastwood, Simon Finfer, Ross Freebairn, Victoria King, Natalie Linke, Edward Litton, Colin McArthur, Shay McGuinness, Rakshit Panwar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 18% |
| Colombia | 7 | 10% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Scientists | 8 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#779,696
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#736
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,399
of 480,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.