↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking the combination treatment of fulvestrant and anastrozole for metastatic breast cancer: an integrated reanalysis of aromatase–estrogen receptor axis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Rethinking the combination treatment of fulvestrant and anastrozole for metastatic breast cancer: an integrated reanalysis of aromatase–estrogen receptor axis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40169-019-0246-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing Huang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,325,093
of 16,241,127 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#226
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,314
of 385,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#29
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,241,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.