Title |
Rethinking therapeutic strategies in cancer: Wars, fields, anomalies and monsters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Theory & Health, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1057/sth.2016.4 |
Authors |
Simon Stewart, Cyril Rauch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 25% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,289,793
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Social Theory & Health
#85
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,138
of 315,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Theory & Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.