↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12178-019-09588-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Widner, Mark Dunleavy, Scott Lynch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 17 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 85 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 99 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,065,715
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#209
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,302
of 359,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.