| Title |
Hook, Line and Sinker: Do Tinder Matches and Meet Ups Lead to One-Night Stands?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Psychological Science, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40806-019-00222-z |
| Authors |
Trond Viggo Grøntvedt, Mons Bendixen, Ernst O. Botnen, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 381 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 17% |
| Spain | 27 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 4% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Sweden | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Chile | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 43 | 11% |
| Unknown | 198 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 340 | 89% |
| Scientists | 27 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#51,025
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Psychological Science
#4
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,071
of 478,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Psychological Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.