↓ Skip to main content

Finger Tapping Task Activation vs. TMS Hotspot: Different Locations and Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Finger Tapping Task Activation vs. TMS Hotspot: Different Locations and Networks
Published in
Brain Topography, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10548-019-00741-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jue Wang, Hai-Jiang Meng, Gong-Jun Ji, Ying Jing, Hong-Xiao Wang, Xin-Ping Deng, Zi-Jian Feng, Na Zhao, Yu-Feng Zang, Jian Zhang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 50%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,296,661
of 13,897,220 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#315
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,604
of 173,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them