↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive survey of the relationship between self-efficacy and performance for the governmental auditors

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
A comprehensive survey of the relationship between self-efficacy and performance for the governmental auditors
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2104-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jau-Ming Su, Shue-Ching Lee, Sang-Bing Tsai, Tzu-Li Lu

Abstract

As governmental auditing is involved in evaluating the legitimacy, economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of how the various administrative branches use their allocated resources to optimize the government's functions, it is expected that the performance of the auditors in charge are strongly influenced by their respective qualities such as self-efficacy and experience, etc. To further understand the factors that may enhance their performance and to ultimately provide practical recommendations for the audit authorities, we have surveyed about 50 % of all the governmental auditors in Taiwan. The result showed that any auditing experience and professionalization do positively influence the professional awareness, and acquired knowledge and skillset of an auditor can effectively improve his or her professional judgment. We also found that perceived ability, problem-solving skills, and resource sharing may significantly impact any performance involved. Our study provides a workable management guidelines for strengthening the self-efficacy of audit authorities in Taiwan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Lecturer 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 39 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 35 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,258,962
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#773
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,017
of 299,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#69
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.