↓ Skip to main content

Mentorship in academic radiology: why it matters

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Mentorship in academic radiology: why it matters
Published in
Insights into Imaging, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13244-019-0799-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam A. Bredella, David Fessell, James H. Thrall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 32 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 35 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,402,572
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#60
of 1,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,288
of 366,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.